Gå til hovedinnhold
Publisert 2020

Read in English

Publikasjonsdetaljer

Tidsskrift : Journal of sensory studies , p. 15 , 2020

Internasjonale standardnummer :
Trykt : 0887-8250
Elektronisk : 1745-459X

Publikasjonstype : Vitenskapelig artikkel

Bidragsytere : Berget, Ingunn; Bech, Søren; Giacalone, Davide; Moulin, Samuel; Pedersen, Mads Erling; Varela-Tomasco, Paula; Næs, Tormod

Forskningsområder

Sensorikk

Har du spørsmål om noe vedrørende publikasjonen, kan du kontakte Nofimas bibliotekleder.

Kjetil Aune
Bibliotekleder
kjetil.aune@nofima.no

Sammendrag

Quantitative Descriptive Analysis (QDA) was compared with novel sensory methodology on five high‐end loudspeakers using five tracks. The focus of the study was on the ability of different sensory methods to predict quality assessments (liking) made by consumers. Preference mapping indicates that projective mapping (PM) and Check‐All‐That‐Apply (CATA) when performed with experts can provide results comparable to QDA, although slightly less accurate. PM done by consumers is less comparable to QDA. Combinations of the sensory tests were also attempted without any clear improvement of results.

Kontaktpersoner: