Sound quality perception of loudspeakers evaluated by different sensory descriptive methods and preference mapping
Publikasjonsdetaljer
Tidsskrift : Journal of sensory studies , p. 15 , 2020
Internasjonale standardnummer
:
Trykt
:
0887-8250
Elektronisk
:
1745-459X
Publikasjonstype : Vitenskapelig artikkel
Lenker
:
DOI
:
doi.org/10.1111/joss.12620
Forskningsområder
Sensorikk
Har du spørsmål om noe vedrørende publikasjonen, kan du kontakte Nofimas bibliotekleder.
Kjetil Aune
Bibliotekleder
kjetil.aune@nofima.no
Sammendrag
Quantitative Descriptive Analysis (QDA) was compared with novel sensory methodology on five high‐end loudspeakers using five tracks. The focus of the study was on the ability of different sensory methods to predict quality assessments (liking) made by consumers. Preference mapping indicates that projective mapping (PM) and Check‐All‐That‐Apply (CATA) when performed with experts can provide results comparable to QDA, although slightly less accurate. PM done by consumers is less comparable to QDA. Combinations of the sensory tests were also attempted without any clear improvement of results.
