Gå til hovedinnhold
Publisert 2009

Read in English

Publikasjonsdetaljer

Tidsskrift : Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems , vol. 96 , p. 172–181–10 , 2009

Utgiver : Elsevier

Internasjonale standardnummer :
Trykt : 0169-7439
Elektronisk : 1873-3239

Publikasjonstype : Vitenskapelig artikkel

Bidragsytere : Liland, Kristian Hovde; Mosleth, Ellen F.

Sak : 2

Har du spørsmål om noe vedrørende publikasjonen, kan du kontakte Nofimas bibliotekleder.

Kjetil Aune
Bibliotekleder
kjetil.aune@nofima.no

Sammendrag

Analysing experimental design data is usually performed by analysis of variance (ANOVA). In situations where the higher orders of interactions hold the most relevant information, generalised multiplicative analysis of variance (GEMANOVA), which is based on parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC), may be a useful supplement to ANOVA. By GEMANOVA the information in the data is compressed down to a few multiplicative components describing the main variation in the data including relevant interaction phenomena. GEMANOVA is best used as an explorative tool. Still there is a need for validation criteria to assist the model building. In the present publication we present such a validation criterion for GEMANOVA models based on bootstrap methodology. The method is demonstrated on a data set consisting of a pot experiment, measuring the nitrogen-to-sulfur ratio in wheat grown under different fertilising schemes. It was found that GEMANOVA revealed complex patterns in the data which were unobservable by ANOVA. (c) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Kontaktpersoner: