Reduced Plastic in the Seafood Industry
Norway exports salmon fillets in large quantities, the quality of which must be preserved during transportation. Nofima researchers are investigating the possibility of preserving quality and food safety and focusing on reducing the use of plastics.
Facts about the research
The SeaPack innovation project is funded by the Research Council of Norway and participating companies. The project is owned by SalMar, and the other participating companies are Norsk Lastebærer Pool (NLP), Tommen Gram, Multivac, Lycro, Marel, Praxair and Keep-it Technologies. Nofima and Østfoldforskning are the research partners in the project.
An important property of the packaging is to protect the salmon fillets and, in order to attain the best possible quality and desired shelf life, the fillets must also be protected from oxygen.
Packaging must be dependable
A significant proportion of the exported salmon fillets are packed into ‘big batches’, i.e. packages containing 10-12 kg of fillets. Two big batches are often packed into in each transportation container. The packages are often handled by machine, so they must be able to withstand bumps and knocks. Thus, it is needed that the material has the requisite mechanical strength while remaining relatively flexible. In addition, it is imperative that it inhibit transmission of oxygen and in specific protects the product against oxygen.
Material thickness is important when products are packed using thermoforming, such as form-fill-seal. Form fill sealing involves forming the bottom web, after which the product is filled into the package. Air is subsequently expelled before the top web is sealed.
“We have investigated the potential for reducing the thickness of the plastic material without compromising on the quality and durability of the packaging or shelf life of the fillets. We have determined that it is entirely possible to use thinner plastics and thereby reduce plastic consumption,” says Marit Kvalvåg Pettersen, Senior Researcher at Nofima.
Significant reduction in plastic use
When salmon fillets are packed into big batch packages by a form-fill-seal using thermoforming machine, two different plastic films are applied. One film (the bottom web) is formed into the bottom and side walls, while the other film (the top web) is sealed on top of the packages. Since the bottom web is stretched to form the bottom and side walls, it must be thicker than the plastic film on top, and the thickness should be determined by applied drawing depth.
The researchers have compared current conventional plastic films with slightly thinner versions. If the thinner versions are utilised, plastic use can be reduced by around 10 percent in this specific study.
Preservation of fish quality
“The shelf life and quality of fish are determined by the number of spoilage bacteria. Our analyses of bacterial growth in fish stored at 4 °C after four, eight, twelve, and fifteen days showed, in general, no significant differences between packages with different plastic film thicknesses,” says Marit Kvalvåg Pettersen.
New packaging solutions have already been implemented and engendered changes at the producer.
“Based on the project results, we have opted to switch to thinner plastic films for big batch packages. As a consequence, we have reduced plastic use by 27 tonnes a year,” says Pål Storø from SalMar. SalMar is project owner of the SeaPack project.
Environmental effects of plastic reduction
Researchers at Østfoldforskning research institute are utilising life-cycle analyses to study the effect of reduced plastic consumption.
“In general, the environmental impact of packaging is reduced proportionally to the reduction in material quantities. But different packaging materials have different climate footprints, since different packaging materials constitute different plastic materials and different plastics have different methods of production. A more detailed analysis is required if the material composition of the packaging is changed,” explains researcher Ellen Soldal from Østfoldforskning.
She adds that greenhouse gas emissions are not the only environmental burden associated with plastic use.
“It’s important to examine other factors as well, such as litter and fossil fuel consumption,” concludes Soldal.